Blog : Economy

What you Need to Know About the Latest Mortgage Rule Changes

What you Need to Know About the Latest Mortgage Rule Changes

If you’ve tuned into the news today, you’ve probably heard that there are new mortgage rules coming into effect on January 1st. 2018. Over the next week you’ll most likely hear a lot of commentary on whether these rules are good, bad, necessary, or unnecessary. And no doubt someone somewhere will come to the conclusion that no one will ever get a mortgage again, and that the housing market in Canada is going to come crashing down around us. Please remember that it’s the media’s job to write headlines and attract eyes, so they tend to sensationalize everything. Take what you hear with a grain of salt. Mortgages will still be written, and houses will still be bought.

At the end of the day, these new rules (outlined below) will come into play, and there’s nothing we can do to change the government’s mind. So how do we respond? Well… as it becomes increasingly difficult to qualify for a mortgage, your goal should be to work with a mortgage professional that gives you more choices. Instead of working with a single institution; having access to a single line of mortgage products, when you work with a mortgage broker, you have access to many different lenders, with a wide variety of choices.

As mortgage rules tighten, your goal should be to find as much flexibility as possible, you do this by working with a mortgage broker. So if you have any questions about your mortgage, please don’t hesitate to contact me anytime at 416.945.9123 or by email at mat@fugeremortgage.ca , I’d love to have a conversation with you.

Okay, so on to the changes… the biggest change to the rules surrounding mortgage qualification is that a requirement to stress test each mortgage will be now applied to all borrowers, instead of just borrowers who have less than a 20% downpayment. Qualification for all mortgages will now be made at a minimum qualifying rate which is the greater of the five-year benchmark rate published by the Bank of Canada or the contractual mortgage rate +2%. 

OSFI (The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions) released their final version of their new guidelines for the mortgage industry. Below is the news release from OSFI. called: OSFI is reinforcing a strong and prudent regulatory regime for residential mortgage underwriting

News Release

For Immediate Release

OTTAWA – October 17, 2017 – Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada

Today the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada (OSFI) published the final version of Guideline B-20 − Residential Mortgage Underwriting Practices and Procedures. The revised Guideline, which comes into effect on January 1, 2018, applies to all federally regulated financial institutions.

The changes to Guideline B-20 reinforce OSFI’s expectation that federally regulated mortgage lenders remain vigilant in their mortgage underwriting practices. The final Guideline focuses on the minimum qualifying rate for uninsured mortgages, expectations around loan-to-value (LTV) frameworks and limits, and restrictions to transactions designed to circumvent those LTV limits.

OSFI is setting a new minimum qualifying rate, or “stress test,” for uninsured mortgages.

  • Guideline B-20 now requires the minimum qualifying rate for uninsured mortgages to be the greater of the five-year benchmark rate published by the Bank of Canada or the contractual mortgage rate +2%.

OSFI is requiring lenders to enhance their loan-to-value (LTV) measurement and limits so they will be dynamic and responsive to risk.

  • Under the final Guideline, federally regulated financial institutions must establish and adhere to appropriate LTV ratio limits that are reflective of risk and are updated as housing markets and the economic environment evolve.

OSFI is placing restrictions on certain lending arrangements that are designed, or appear designed to circumvent LTV limits.

  • A federally regulated financial institution is prohibited from arranging with another lender a mortgage, or a combination of a mortgage and other lending products, in any form that circumvents the institution’s maximum LTV ratio or other limits in its residential mortgage underwriting policy, or any requirements established by law.

Quote

“These revisions to Guideline B-20 reinforce a strong and prudent regulatory regime for residential mortgage underwriting in Canada,” said Superintendent Jeremy Rudin.

Quick Facts

  • On July 7, 2017, OSFI published draft revisions to Guideline B-20 – Residential Mortgage Underwriting Practices and Procedures. The consultation period ended on August 17, 2017.
  • OSFI received more than 200 submissions from federally regulated financial institutions, financial industry associations, other organizations active in the mortgage market, as well as the general public.
  • The cover letter includes an unattributed summary of the comments and an explanation of how these issues were dealt with in the final Guideline B-20.
  • Following publication of Guideline B-20 OSFI plans to assess Guideline B-21 − Residential Mortgage Insurance Underwriting Practices and Procedures for consequential amendments.

Associated Links

About OSFI

The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada (OSFI) is an independent agency of the Government of Canada, established in 1987 to protect depositors, policyholders, financial institution creditors and pension plan members, while allowing financial institutions to compete and take reasonable risks.

In the Middle of a 10 Year Term? You Have Options!

In the Middle of a 10 Year Term? You Have Options!

If you bought a house, or had a mortgage renew roughly five years ago, there’s a chance the struggling economy and the relatively low interest rate environment (at the time) influenced you to “play it safe” and lock in a mortgage term for the next ten years. Because, at the time, it seemed like interest rates couldn’t go any lower and the difference in the interest rate between the five year fixed term, and the ten year fixed was negligible. Five years extra security made a lot of sense.

Without the benefit of a crystal ball, this looked like a good decision. However, unfortunately as interest rates have dropped even further, you’re probably now stuck in a mortgage with a rate that is higher than what is currently being offered on the market. If you are second guessing your original decision. Don’t. You made a decision based on the information you had at the time, if rates would’ve gone up, you’d be in a great place now. But, as that isn’t the case, the best we can do is look for a silver lining, and here it is, did you know that there is a mandatory fine print clause in your ten year contract that might help you save money over the next five years?

After the first five years of a ten year term has been completed, the penalty to break the mortgage is three months interest, instead of the interest rate differential penalty. That’s a really big deal!

Penalty WordSwag

It doesn’t matter which lender you are with, this is actually a law in Canada, and not conditional upon the contract you signed with your lender. So, if the thought of an outrageous penalty has been keeping you from looking at all your options, you should really check out what is available on the market today.

Interest rates are really low, so low in fact that there’s a chance you can switch out of your ten year rate into another mortgage product at a lower rate and not only cover the cost of the three month interest penalty, but actually be further ahead only a couple years into your new term. The real goal is to save thousands of dollars by switching, and that is very possible!

As each person’s financial situation is different, rather than going through a hypothetical situation where we explain how this all works for hypothetical people, if you have made it this far, chances are this applies to you. You should really reach out and please contact me anytime at 416.945.9123 or by email at mat@fugeremortgage.ca to see about all your options, because you have options!.

There’s no cost for my services, so let’s see how much money you can save over the next five years!

Are There More Mortgage Rule Changes Coming?

Are There More Mortgage Rule Changes Coming?

Recently, the Bank of Canada released its semi-annual Financial Systems Review (PDF document), which identifies some of the major risks that the Bank foresees on the economic horizon.

Unsurprisingly, the Bank pinpoints increased levels of Canadian household debt and rapidly increasing prices in Toronto and Vancouver as vulnerabilities to the financial system. The good news is that, despite these vulnerabilities increasing over the past six months, the Bank of Canada is confident that the financial system remains resilient, and that overall, national economic conditions continue to improve. This positive outlook, combined with strong economic growth, are playing a role in the not-so-subtle hint that the Bank may increase interest rates sooner rather than later.

So what does this policy review indicate for future federal interventions in the mortgage market? The short answer is a lot.

It is no coincidence that the aforementioned vulnerabilities mirror the rationale used by the federal government for the mortgage insurance and eligibility changes in October. The Bank of Canada, the Department of Finance and CMHC are all aligned and focused on curbing elevated levels of household debt and ensuring the stability of the housing sector. This report could be viewed as representative of the problems and policies that the finance department is considering.

It is no surprise then that the Bank of Canada is pleased with the impact that the October changes have had on the debt-to-income ratios of insured mortgages (chart 3). But, the changes have also had an impact on increasing the market share of new mortgages that are uninsured. Clearly, this was an intended impact of the federal government’s changes and now the Bank of Canada is identifying the uninsured space as the next place to consider in terms of whether action is needed.

Chart 3

The Bank’s concerns will likely find a supportive audience at the Ministry of Finance and at CMHC. The data showing the increasing debt-to-income ratios for the uninsured sector (table 1) could trigger an investigation into additional regulation in the uninsured space by the Ministry of Finance or OSFI.

Charty mcChart Face

The first measure that is likely being considered is related to Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOCs). This is clear for two reasons. First, because the Bank of Canada believes that the greater use of HELOCs could also be contributing to increasing household indebtedness. According to the Bank, HELOCs have increased at rates above income growth since early 2016, and have accounted for approximately 10 per cent of total outstanding household credit in recent quarters. Second, the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada recently released a report raising concerns that HELOCs may be putting some Canadians at risk of over borrowing. The timing of this report and the Financial Systems Review may not be coincidental.

It seems OSFI may be considering making changes to its B-20 underwriting guidelines; the Bank of Canada’s report suggests that OSFI will begin a public consultation shortly.

The critical policy question that the Department of Finance could be considering is whether to extend the stress test for insured mortgages to uninsured mortgages as well. This could create a more even playing field for lenders who originate a greater percentage of insured mortgages and could possibly have an impact in cooling the markets of Toronto and Vancouver. However, it could also negatively impact the rest of the Canadian housing market, which is not suffering from the same vulnerabilities of Toronto and Vancouver and could become unnecessary if the Bank of Canada raises interest rates.

Finally, there was a small policy section in the review that few may have paid much attention to but is important and provides some very helpful insights into the future of Canada’s private mortgage securitization market. The Bank of Canada recognizes that the recent changes have negatively impacted mortgage lenders that rely on portfolio insurance and that the increased growth in uninsured mortgages have created an opportunity for private residential mortgage-backed securities. The Bank of Canada goes even further and suggests that “properly structured private securitization would benefit the financial system by helping lenders fund loans.” (page 13).

It is surprising that this issue hasn’t received more attention because the Bank of Canada is tacitly endorsing a significant policy shift away from CMHC-backed mortgage securities to a private sector mortgage securitization market. This confirms that the creation of this market is an intended impact from the federal government’s changes to portfolio insurance and aligns with CMHC President Evan Siddall’s testimony to the finance committee on the changes to portfolio insurance.

Until the Bank of Canada is convinced that the housing sector no longer poses the greatest liability to the Canadian economy, Canadians will continue to see the federal government scrutinize mortgage activity in Canada with an eye to reduce the increasing levels of household debt in the country..

Let’s hope the government shifts their focus to unsecured household debt instead of further secured debt restrictions. However, if the Bank of Canada’s review is representative of the Ministry of Finance’s considerations, watch out for changes to HELOCs, through B-20 changes, the stress test being applied to uninsured mortgages and continued growth in the developing private sector mortgage securitization market.

 

This article originally appeared on Canadian Mortgage Trends, a publication of Mortgage Professionals Canada on June 20th 2017. It was written by the manager of government and policy for Mortgage Professionals Canada, Samuel Duncan. 

Just How Big is the Canadian Mortgage Market Really?

Just How Big is the Canadian Mortgage Market Really?

With all the government changes happening in the mortgage market right now, the good people over at Mortgage Professionals Canada via their online publication Canadian Mortgage Trends just published an interesting couple of articles on their blog. Most recently “How Big is Canada’s Mortgage Market” gives perspective to just how much money is leant annually through mortgage financing, while providing context to the importance of their recent article “DOF Challenged in Parliament”

Here are both of these articles in their entirety. If you have any questions about what is going on with mortgages, or want to have a look at your financial situation to see where you stand, please contact me anytime at 416.945.9123 or by email at mat@fugeremortgage.ca

Oh, and if you just want to know how big the Canadian mortgage market is – well, estimates would say that over $400 Billion in mortgages is written each year in Canada. That is a lot of money.

How Big is Canada’s Mortgage Market?

Thems are some big shoes

When it comes to the total mortgages arranged in Canada each year (by all lenders), definitive data isn’t easy to find. So we have to rely on estimates.

CIBC economist Benjamin Tal is one of the best estimators out there. And his latest figures suggest the market is a lot bigger than some in our business may think.

The estimates we typically cite for annual residential mortgage originations range from about $210 to $250 billion. But that doesn’t include renewals.

By Tal’s calculations, the total of all residential mortgages negotiated or renegotiated in 2016 was $405 billion. This figure is a much truer indication of what the theoretical potential market is for mortgage lenders.

This data includes purchases, refinances and renewals of owner-occupied and residential investment properties (including 1- to 4-unit and 5+ unit residential properties).

Tal writes that the total number is up 5.5% over 2015. Canada’s “typical” home price rose 13% in the same timeframe, according to Royal LePage data. But with insurers already citing a 15-20% drop in business since the mortgage rule changes, 2017 volumes won’t be as rosy.

DoF Challenged in Parliament

Ottawa Canada. November 14th 2016 - Parliament of Canada on Parliament Hill in Ottawa
Ottawa Canada. November 14th 2016 – Parliament of Canada on Parliament Hill in Ottawa

MPs are questioning why the Liberal government took liquidity out of the refinance market, and Dan Albas is one of the most vocal.

In the House of Commons yesterday, the Conservative MP charged the Department of Finance with “Increasing interest costs on refinanced mortgages.” This of course is a result of the Finance Minister’s ban on default insuring refinances. The move has decimated competition in the refi space, which Albas says “hurts middle-class Canadians.”

“Will the Liberals reverse this punitive and damaging change?” he questioned on his Facebook page today. Albas asked the equivalent in Parliament yesterday, to which the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance responded but, “didn’t answer the question at all!” Albas charges.

Here’s a video of that exchange…

This debate followed hours of testimony these past two weeks about the new mortgage rules. Those hearings were held by Parliament’s Finance Committee and included 38 expert witnesses.

In an opinion piece today that touched on the hearings, Albas said:

As the public servants involved in this area could not provide a coherent reason for this punitive [refinance] policy, a motion I put forward to have the Finance Minister appear directly before the Finance Committee was adopted thanks in part to some Liberal MPs voting in support.

It appears, however, the Finance Minister is sending others to talk for him (on Monday), namely:

  • Ginette Petitpas Taylor, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance
  • Rob Stewart, Associate Deputy Minister, Department of Finance
  • Cynthia Leach, Chief, Housing Finance, Capital Markets Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance

CMHC head Evan Siddall will also speak at the same meeting. Siddall has been quoted by Bloomberg as saying lenders have “no skin in the game” and “misaligned” incentives, which he later called a misstatement on his part. So the mortgage industry will be watching for any new bombs he might drop on Monday.

RRSP Basics: Questions Answered

RRSP Basics: Questions Answered

Guest post by Randy Cass,

Welcome to RRSP season, otherwise known as the one time of year you’ll willingly read an article with RRSP in the title. It’s not a traditionally exciting topic, we get it, but it’s an important one. A little planning now will pay off big time later. We’re going to walk you through some of the most common questions we hear. Let’s get into it!

What’s so special about the RRSP?

A Registered Retirement Savings Plan is an account (think of it as a basket) that holds savings and investments. The magic of the RRSP is twofold: contributions are made with pre-tax income, meaning you’ll get a tax refund, and investments grow inside your RRSP basket tax free. That’s right, the tax man isn’t allowed to stick his hands in there. Compound interest is left to do what it does best, grow your nest egg!

Just remember deferring tax doesn’t mean you’ll avoid paying it altogether. You’ll have to pay taxes when you withdraw money during retirement just as you would on any other income. The idea is you should be in a lower tax bracket when you retire and take out money, therefore you’ll pay less tax overall. Making sense so far?

What kinds of things can I put in there?

You can fill your RRSP basket with investments like stocks, bonds, GICs, mutual funds, ETFs, and money market funds. A common misconception is that a RRSP is an investment you purchase. It’s an account you open (think basket) and fill with investments you buy.

How much can I contribute this year?

You can contribute up to 18% of your income to a maximum of $25,370 for 2016. Your contribution room accumulates over time so if you haven’t maxed out your contributions in the past (many people haven’t!) you’ll have even more room available. Check the notice of assessment you received with last years tax return, or give CRA a call, to find out exactly how much contribution room you have. Your accountant will be able to tell you as well.

What’s this contribution deadline I’ve seen advertised?

The stretch between New Years and the contribution deadline has been dubbed “RRSP Season” which you’ve likely seen advertised at local banks. March 1st 2017 is the latest you can contribute to your RRSP and have the deduction count for the 2016 tax year.

This doesn’t mean any contributions made during January and February 2017 have to be claimed against the 2016 tax year. If you want to make a contribution now and save part or all of the deduction for 2017 (perhaps you’re expecting your income to be higher) you can do that.

How often can or should I contribute to my RRSP?

All this RRSP season hype might give you the impression you can only contribute once a year, but that’s not true! You can set up regular automatic contributions (monthly, quarterly, etc) and avoid the RRSP season rush altogether.

An unexpected expense came up, can I withdraw money from my RRSP to cover it?

You can, but it might not be your best option. Depending on how much you withdraw you’ll be charged a 10-30% penalty and you’ll have to pay income tax on that money. Keep in mind you won’t be able to re-contribute the amount you withdrew at a later date. That contribution room is lost.

Two ways you can withdraw money without penalty is under the Home Buyers Plan and the Lifelong Learning Plan. The former is eligible to first time home buyers while the latter is available if you enrol in a qualified education program.

What happens to my RRSP when I retire?

Regardless of when you decide to retire, you’ll have to close your RRSP by December 31t in the year you turn 71. You can withdraw all your money (and be hit with a hefty tax bill), purchase an annuity, or transfer it into a Registered Retirement Income Fund (RRIF). You don’t have to convert your RRSP to a RIFF when you turn 65 or at the same time you retire. You can convert it at anytime before you turn 71.

What should I consider when opening or moving my RRSP?

You’ll need to look at the fees you’re paying—these include management expense ratios (MERs) for any mutual funds or ETFs, trading commissions, and annual administration fees. You want to keep these fees low so your money can grow as much as possible. If you’re working with a financial advisor check your statements to verify how much you’re paying. If you’re looking for lower fee investment options consider going the self directed route or opening account with one of Canada’s digital wealth advisors.

We think Nest Wealth is pretty awesome, but you know, we’re biased.

That’s it for now. You made it! You’re well on your way to mastering your RRSP and reaching those retirement goals. Knowledge is power, my friends.

 

This is a guest post from Randy Cass, CEO of Nest Wealth, a Canadian asset management company, it was originally published on their website on January 19th, 2017.

Annual State of the Residential Mortgage Market in Canada December 2016

Annual State of the Residential Mortgage Market in Canada December 2016

Every year, Mortgage Professionals Canada (Canada’s national mortgage broker association) releases a report called The Annual State of the Residential Mortgage Market in Canada. Prepared by MPC Chief Economist Will Dunning, the report is a collection of surveys that compiles data on mortgage transactions and consumer sentiment.

Below is the press release from Mortgage Professionals Canada with their highlights, along with a copy of this lengthy document. Expect to see some more highlights on the blog in the coming days! There is certainly a lot of great information in this report! 

Rental Income and Housing Affordability Highlight a “New Normal” For Young Canadians in the Mortgage Market

Canadians who purchased their first home within the past two years reflect a “new normal” in the Canadian housing market, according to Mortgage Professionals Canada’s fall 2016 survey. Thirty-four per cent of recent first time buyers think it is important to generate income from their properties, and 13 per cent of those who undertook renovations on their homes did so to add space for a rental unit. Half of 18-34 year-olds do not own a home, primarily because they are saving for a down payment.

“Creating income remains a useful tool for first-time homebuyers,” said Paul Taylor, President of Mortgage Professionals Canada. “People are looking for ways to make owning a home more affordable. Generating income allows them to reduce their mortgage more quickly.”

Canadians responding to the survey underscore this point. For homes purchased during 2014 to 2016, the average contracted amortization period is 22.4 years. Each year more than a third of mortgage holders take actions that will shorten their amortization periods. The most recent buyers expect that, on average, they will repay their mortgages in 18.8 years, which is 3.6 years shorter than their average contracted period.

On October 3, the federal government announced that for all insured mortgages, the borrower’s ability to afford the payments must be tested using the “posted rate”, which is currently 4.64% and far above the actual interest rates found in the market.

“It is too soon to measure the impacts of this policy change,” said Will Dunning, Mortgage Professionals Canada Chief Economist and author of the Annual State of the Residential Mortgage Market in Canada report. “The survey finds that among potential homebuyers who expect to be subject to that test, their ability to buy a home will be impaired. As a result, they also expect that there will be negative impacts in the overall housing market and in the broader economy.”

Read the rest of the press release here >>

Annual State of the Residential Mortgage Market in Canada

Are Rates Finally Going Up?

Are Rates Finally Going Up?

Well, after many years of unprecedented low interest rates in Canada, it appears the Canadian government by way of rule changes, and the American government by way of Trump, are impacting mortgage rates. Simply put, the Canadian government has recently made it more expensive for banks to lend money, while predictions of the policies that could be implemented by Donald Trump as the new President of the United States has impacted the bond market, which in turn compels lenders to increase rates.

Earlier this month TD announced that they were increasing their TD Mortgage Prime Rate to 2.85%, and if you have already scrolled through your news feed this morning, you will have seen that RBC increased their fixed rate mortgage pricing effective immediately. In typical fashion, it won’t be long until most lenders follow suit and we see increases to mortgage rates across the board. Because let’s face it, banks will use any excuse to make their businesses more profitable.

There is certainly no reason to panic, this seems more like a correction than anything, however, are rates finally heading upwards? It appears that way.

So what does this mean to you? Well… here are some action points.

  • If you have a mortgage that renews in the next 6 months, let’s talk, we can look at your options, and determine the best course of action for you.
  • If you have been thinking about refinancing your mortgage to access equity, there is no time like the present. Let’s talk.
  • If you have been sitting on the fence, considering a venture into the housing market, but aren’t sure… it’s probably a good idea to at least get a pre-approval and hold a rate for up to 120 days. No obligation, but if rates are going up, a rate hold now makes sure you save some money if you decide to make your move.
  • If you are thinking to yourself, I have no idea what I should do… it never hurts to get in touch.

As you can see, regardless of your situation, if you have mortgage questions, please contact me anytime at 416.945.9123 or by email at mat@fugeremortgage.ca, I would love to talk through your options and help you figure out a plan that works for you. I’m never too busy for new clients, or to connect with existing clients.

When Prime Rates Differ?

When Prime Rates Differ?

Although the recent changes to mortgage qualification introduced by the government were intended to create stability in the Canadian housing market, the unintended consequences might have been to make the waters a little muddier. For the first time, it looks like Canadians weighing their mortgage options will have to be aware that not only do different lenders offer different products at different rates, but that the baseline for rate calculation might be different between lenders as well. Comparing apples to apples and oranges to oranges just became more difficult.

You see, in response to these latest changes by the government, last week TD announced that it was raising its TD Mortgage Prime rate to 2.85%, up from 2.70% effective November 1st, 2016. Speculation was that the other major banks would follow suit, however it’s a week later, and still we have no action. This is clearly a pre-emptive move by TD in anticipation of higher mortgage funding costs. And you can’t hold it against them, banks are really good at making money, and they do that by charging interest on lending products to consumers. Well, that and debit transaction fees, but that’s an entirely different topic altogether.

Customers with fixed rate mortgages will be unaffected by these changes, however variable rate mortgage holders will now be paying more interest at TD than any other bank in Canada. But here is where things get complicated, although variable rate mortgages are based on the prime rate (which is now not consistent between all lenders) there is usually what is called a “component to prime”, so it’s usually prime rate, plus or minus a component. At the time this was published most lenders are offering a discount of around a half a percentage point on their variable rate products. With a higher prime rate, TD could effectively offer a deeper discount, and appear like they are offering the lowest rate on the market, but in actual fact, they would be at a higher effective rate.

This certainly isn’t meant to be a slam against TD bank, TD has offered some great products in the past, and will no doubt continue to do so. The main point of this article is simply:

Banks are in the business of making money, mortgage brokers are in the business of taking care of their clients.

With all the products available on the market, how do you know which one is best for you? That’s where I come in. I am an independent mortgage professional, my obligation is to you, my job is to know the ins and outs of all the products offered by different lenders, so that you don’t have to. So regardless of what bank is offering what prime with whatever discount, you have someone who sees through the noise, assesses your needs, and recommends a mortgage solution that is best for you.

If you have any questions, or would like to discuss your mortgage, please contact me anytime at 416.945.9123 or by email at mat@fugeremortgage.ca , I would love to hear from you!

Creating Stability in the Canadian Housing Market

Creating Stability in the Canadian Housing Market

This morning, Finance Minister Bill Morneau announced new housing measures, changes meant to alleviate risk in Canada’s current housing market. The measures include:

  • Standardizing lending criteria for high- and low-ratio mortgages, including a mortgage stress test
  • Closing tax loopholes for capital gains exemptions on principal residence sales
  • Consulting with industry stakeholders to ensure risk is properly distributed.

It is good to note that these changes will not have any impact on existing mortgage holders, they will be applied going forward.

“Canadians have told us they are concerned about growing household debt and rapidly rising house prices in some of our biggest cities, particularly in markets like Toronto and Vancouver. These concerns have grown over many years, and there are no quick fixes. The federal government plays an important role in ensuring that housing markets are stable and function efficiently. My colleagues and I are committed to continuing to work with provinces and municipalities to address the concerns of middle class families, and to ensure Canada’s housing markets and financial system remain strong, stable and resilient well into the future.”

–Bill Morneau, Minister of Finance

During his press conference, the Finance Minister said repeatedly that he believes the housing market is stable, and that these are simply preventative measures. Over the next week there will be more information available about the specifics of what this announcement means, and that will be shared here, however in the mean time, here is the announcement from the government found on the Department of Finance website.

Backgrounder: Ensuring a Stable Housing Market for All Canadians

Protecting the long-term financial security of Canadians is a cornerstone of the Government of Canada’s efforts to help the middle class and those working hard to join it. Recognizing that for many families, their homes are their most important asset, the Government is taking preventative measures today to ensure a healthy, competitive and stable housing market for all Canadians.

Today’s actions recognize the effect that years of low interest rates and shifting attitudes towards debt and indebtedness have had on the housing market. While the overall Canadian housing market is sound, house prices have risen significantly in some markets, notably Toronto and Vancouver, and some borrowers are taking on high levels of debt. In these circumstances, it is important to ensure that these debt levels are sustainable, that lenders are acting prudently, and that financial stability risks do not arise in the event of increases in interest rates or a housing market downturn.

The Minister of Finance has been actively engaged on the housing file. One of the Government’s first steps since being elected nearly a year ago was to address pockets of risk in the housing market by raising the minimum down payment for homes priced above $500,000. Since then, Department of Finance Canada officials have been further studying the housing market, and have led a working group with municipalities and provinces, as well as federal agencies such as the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions and Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.

This in-depth analysis, informed by the productive dialogue with our partners, has informed today’s announcement of three complementary measures designed to reinforce the Canadian housing finance system, to help protect the long-term financial security of borrowers, and to improve tax fairness for Canadian homeowners. Analysis and cooperation are ongoing as the Government continues to carefully monitor the situation.

1. Bringing Consistency to Insured Mortgage Rules

“Mortgage rate stress test” for all insured borrowers:

To help ensure new homeowners can afford their mortgages even when interest rates begin to rise, mortgage insurance rules require in some cases that lenders “stress test” a borrower’s ability to make their mortgage payments at a higher interest rate. Currently, this requirement only applies to a subset of insured mortgages with variable interest rates or fixed interest rates with terms less than five years. Effective October 17, 2016, this requirement will apply to all insured mortgages, including fixed-rate mortgages with terms of five years and more. Homeowners with an existing insured mortgage or those renewing existing insured mortgages are not affected by this measure.

Safer lending:

There are currently different rules in place depending on what proportion of the value of the property is covered by a loan. For example, mortgage insurance criteria for a loan that represents 80 per cent of the value of the property or less (low loan-to-value ratio mortgages) are not as stringent as for high loan-to-value ratio mortgages (loans that represent more than 80 per cent of the value of the property). This could lead to increased risk for the taxpayers who ultimately back insured mortgages. To help ensure that taxpayer support for mortgage funding is targeted towards safer lending, effective November 30, 2016, mortgages insured by lenders through portfolio insurance and other low loan-to-value ratio mortgage insurance must meet the same loan eligibility criteria as high loan-to-value insured mortgages.

2. Improving Tax Fairness and Closing Loopholes

The Government is committed to tax fairness, and to ensuring that the exemption from capital gains tax on the sale of a principal residence is available only in appropriate cases. Proposed changes to the tax rules would ensure that the principal residence capital gains exemption is not abused, including by non-residents buying and selling a property in the same year. An additional measure would improve compliance and administration of the tax system with respect to dispositions of real estate, including the sale of a principal residence.

3. Managing Risk and Protecting Taxpayers

The Government continuously monitors the housing market and is committed to implementing policy measures that maintain a healthy, competitive and stable housing market. As a part of this effort, the Government is looking at whether the distribution of risk in Canada’s housing finance system is balanced, and appropriately reflects all parties’ abilities to share in the management of housing risks.

To this end, the Government will launch a consultation process with market participants this fall on lender risk sharing, a potential policy option that would require mortgage lenders to manage a portion of loan losses on insured mortgages that default. Currently, lenders are able to transfer virtually all of the risk of insured mortgages to mortgage insurers, and indirectly to taxpayers through the government guarantee.

If you have any questions about what any of this means, please contact me anytime at 416.945.9123 or by email at mat@fugeremortgage.ca!

Further Tightening of the Mortgage Belt

Further Tightening of the Mortgage Belt

Before reading this you should be warned that the following content is pretty dry… like eating 8 saltine crackers without drinking water dry. If you need to go and get something to drink before proceeding, no worries, we will wait here. Take your time.

The quick and dirty version, as of November 1st 2016, OSFI is going to require banks to have more money on hand to protect them in case the Canadian economy decides to ride a shark with 200 pounds of dynamite strapped to it’s chest into the mouth of an active volcano. This means two things, banks will probably slowly increase rates to cover their costs and secondly you will probably see mortgage qualification tighten a little further.

Here is all you need to know on the subject, sourced from a few different places online.

OSFI

On September 9th, The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released for public consultation, revisions to its Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline (CAR). The following is the official release:

OSFI’s CAR Guideline provides a framework for assessing the capital adequacy of federally regulated deposit-taking institutions and is updated periodically to ensure that capital requirements continue to reflect underlying risks and developments in the financial industry.

The CAR Guideline is based on requirements agreed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. As a member of the Basel Committee, OSFI supports and applies the global risk-based framework to its regulated institutions through a measured and tailored approach that is suited to the Canadian context.

Captured in this set of revisions are OSFI’s expectations on the domestic implementation of two global capital adequacy standards issued by the Basel Committee in recent years. In this draft, OSFI outlines its discretionary approach to the implementation of the Basel III countercyclical buffer regime in Canada as well as provides guidance on the application of Basel’s equity investment in funds rules, which require institutions to hold adequate capital against equity investments in funds.

To reflect the changing risks in the Canadian mortgage market, the draft CAR Guideline has also been updated to include planned revisions to the treatment of insured residential mortgages (see OSFI’s December 2015 letter to industry). Through the capital framework, OSFI is clarifying the conditions under which risk mitigation benefits of mortgage insurance are recognized for regulatory capital purposes. These changes aim to reinforce the need for banks to exercise prudent underwriting and proper due diligence when originating insured mortgages.

Finally, the revisions to the draft guideline provide clarification on how OSFI’s capital framework will apply to federal credit unions.

Quick Facts

  • The implementation date for these changes is set for November 1, 2016 for institutions with an October 31 year end, and January 1, 2017 for institutions with a December 31 year end.
  • OSFI is inviting comments on the proposed updates, which it will consider during the development of the final version of the guideline. The deadline for submitting comments is October 18, 2016.
  • A non-attributed summary of industry comments received along with OSFI’s responses will be posted on OSFI’s website when the final version of the guideline is released.

Associated Links

About OSFI

The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is an independent agency of the Government of Canada, established in 1987, to protect depositors, policyholders, financial institution creditors and pension plan members, while allowing financial institutions to compete and take reasonable risks.

Canadian Mortgage Trends

As most people don’t care to read straight government correspondence, Canadian Mortgage Trends, a publication of Mortgage Professionals Canada published an article summarizing the Capital Adequacy Requirements.

“Under the proposed revised guideline, the amount of capital required to be held by the institutions is not expected to change significantly,” assured a spokesperson. “These changes aim to ensure that capital requirements continue to reflect underlying risks and developments in the financial industry.”

The article goes on to describe an interesting change called a “countercyclical buffer”… if that doesn’t spin you around on your chair, nothing will! Hot stuff! Anyway…

You can read the full article here >>

Money Sense Magazine

Not one to miss a chance at a sensational headline, Money Sense Magazine published an article called “Expect tougher mortgage rules by November”. The article goes on to outline the following:

  • Hot markets prompt tougher rules for banks
  • Taxpayer will be less exposed
  • How it will impact the Canadian home buyer
  • When will tougher rules take affect?

You can read the full article here >> 

Let’s Talk

If you are considering buying a property in the next couple of years, or have a mortgage that you would either like to renew or refinance, please contact me anytime at 416.945.9123 or by email at mat@fugeremortgage.ca. I would love to discuss what is going on in the economy and help you determine if now is a good time for you to make a move.

Let’s talk, I’m always available to you!